PDA

View Full Version : Question for Scot and staff


C0lin
03-24-2006, 02:51 AM
It's mostly for Scot. How is it that you can make a living doing this? Do you bring in a lot of ad revenue, or have some investors? Don't get me wrong, I love this place to death, but I don't see it being a huge money maker. I'm sure there are outside forces in this that I just don't see, so if you could enlighten me, that would be great.

Feelgood
03-24-2006, 03:48 AM
I've always wondered about that myself.

Digital*Firefly
03-24-2006, 08:09 AM
Scot has ties with the Mafia.

Octocamo
03-24-2006, 12:01 PM
He's a drug dealer.

:thup:

Jimador
03-24-2006, 01:35 PM
It's a matter of national security...you will have to contact Homeland Security for approval on whether that can be released.

agn
03-24-2006, 04:54 PM
To be honest, allgames.com hasn't been focused on revenue beyond the google ads because I believe it's more important to focus on creating the content and a unique experience. The video productions and consulting have been the source of income keeping the site alive and the radio show on track. I believe in the Field of Dreams adage, if you build it they will come. The growth of All Games Radio has been steady, and the response from people in the industry has proven that there is interest in what we're doing with the live stream and aggregation of independant content producers.
The Arena location will also be the place we begin to develop more video content as I am in discussions with various outlets looking to work with All Games to create tv projects.

The good news is, we're just getting started and the site will only grow. I've invested my money and time in the allgames.com experience and I believe it will be able to support itself in the next 12 months.

OF course investors and partners are welcome to help speed that process up. :)

C0lin
03-24-2006, 11:46 PM
I'll buy a 49% share for...................$7.52.

Arandar
03-25-2006, 12:58 AM
I'll buy a 49% share for...................$7.52.

Heh yeah per .001 of a share.

To actually invest enough to get an income back when All Games starts making money, you would probably have to invest several thousand dollars.

C0lin
03-25-2006, 01:18 AM
Heh yeah per .001 of a share.

To actually invest enough to get an income back when All Games starts making money, you would probably have to invest several thousand dollars.

I meant to say 49% of the shares, but I guess I didn't word it right. It was my attempt at humor.

JWZZR
03-25-2006, 03:10 AM
To be honest, allgames.com hasn't been focused on revenue beyond the google ads because I believe it's more important to focus on creating the content and a unique experience. The video productions and consulting have been the source of income keeping the site alive and the radio show on track. I believe in the Field of Dreams adage, if you build it they will come. The growth of All Games Radio has been steady, and the response from people in the industry has proven that there is interest in what we're doing with the live stream and aggregation of independant content producers.
The Arena location will also be the place we begin to develop more video content as I am in discussions with various outlets looking to work with All Games to create tv projects.

The good news is, we're just getting started and the site will only grow. I've invested my money and time in the allgames.com experience and I believe it will be able to support itself in the next 12 months.

OF course investors and partners are welcome to help speed that process up. :)


hey one way to to spped it up is to run infomercials on the ALLGAMES NETWORK.or have people give money so that they can hear songs they want on allgames

Arandar
03-25-2006, 05:45 PM
I meant to say 49% of the shares, but I guess I didn't word it right. It was my attempt at humor.

Don't worry I know what you meant and thought it was funny. I was just trying to play of your humor. Like you were saying you would buy 49% of the company for 7.52 but without you saying total I was trying to attempt humor as well saying you would get it for 7.52 but only at per .001 of a share.

C0lin
03-25-2006, 05:49 PM
Don't worry I know what you meant and thought it was funny. I was just trying to play of your humor. Like you were saying you would buy 49% of the company for 7.52 but without you saying total I was trying to attempt humor as well saying you would get it for 7.52 but only at per .001 of a share.

mental note: Arander and I are not a good comic duo. I need Fu for that.

tdb30_
03-28-2006, 11:49 AM
I like the idea of a jukebox type stream. Maybe let people buy credits to pick a song to be played. I can imagine someone using a bunch of credits to have a 1 hour marathon of their favorite song.

Blackwolf
03-28-2006, 12:08 PM
Unfortunately, there are rules against doing that in the licensing contracts with various agencies.

We ARE going to be introducing a voting system, but not for a live jukebox request thingy.