PDA

View Full Version : WWE Divas and Playboy


KingKongSushi
12-29-2004, 02:00 AM
Here is an update for those interested in the WWE Divas/Playboy rumors. Apperently, the source is a photographer with connections with Playboy that has posted on the www.cndb.com message board, which is a celebrity nudity database/reference site. By the looks of his postings, the guy seems to have some valid information, particularly when looking at the other information that he has posted regarding this rumored Playboy spread. Here are the relevant posts the source has made in regards to his story.

On Dec. 20, "Photographer" posted:

They are negotiating right now with the WWE to do a Women of the WWE issue, so far the only Divas that have agreed is Torrie Wilson, Dawn Marie, Miss Jackie, Victoria, Christy Hemme, Joy, Amy Weber, Michelle McCool, and Lilian Garcia, they are still trying to get Lita, Molly Holly, Stephanie McMahon, Ivory, and one other. Trish Stratus, Stacy Keibler and someone else said no.

On Dec. 26, "Photographer" posted a follow up to this rumor with a lot of details.

I found out this week that Stacy Keibler and Molly Holly have both agreed. But both have stipulations. Molly will only appear topless and nothing else will be shown, however, her hands will be covering her breasts in the photo. Kind of like the old Janet Jackson Rolling Stone Issue. Stacy Keibler will show her legs and butt in the pictorial but nothing else. So most likely it will be shot from behind with her turning towards the camera wearing a shirt. With Playboy okay with these stipulations it is now possible that both Trish Stratus and Stephanie McMahon will appear but with provisions like Stacy and Molly. Stephanie wants to appear but has only agreed to be wearing something sexy or see-through, and Trish said she would agree along the same lines. No word on Ivory, as of this point it looks like she will not pose at all. The pictorial is said to be over at least 10 pages, and will hit newsstands around July, not August like originally planned.

Another post....

Sorry I forgot about Lita. Lita is confirmed and will appear all-nude in the pictorial.

And in one last post to recap....


OK here is the info I gathered about the WWE Women:

Victoria -Topless & Full Frontal
Dawn Marie - Topless & Full Frontal
Miss Jackie - Topless Only/Lingerie
Stacy Keibler - Ass and Back only
Stephanie McMahon - See-through Nightie/Lingerie
Michelle McCool - Topless & Full Frontal
Amy Weber - Topless & Full Frontal
Maria - Topless only
Lita - Still Negotiating Poses
Joy Giovanni - Topless & Full Frontal
Christy Hemme - Topless & Ass only
Candace - Topless & Full Frontal
Torrie Wilson - Topless Only/Lingerie
Lilian Garcia - See-Through Nightie/Lingerie
Molly Holly - Topless Only/Lingerie

Please Note, that the Spread is 10 pages, however some of the Divas will only appear once, while others may get one or two pages.


I can't wait to see this Playboy...

All-Night John
12-29-2004, 05:04 PM
Anyone's better than Chyna. Ugh, how gross was that? And it was the all-time best selling Playboy, to boot.

KingKongSushi
12-29-2004, 05:36 PM
I'm glad I didn't see that one.

Captain N
12-30-2004, 12:52 AM
Oh thank god Lita is going to be in it ^_________________________________________________ ______________^

DarkKnightCecil
12-30-2004, 08:10 PM
God I hope this is true. Although, I'm confused about the Torrie poses...she showed everything in the previous 2 issues she was in. Why only topless now?

They should dedicate an entire issue to Stacy Keibler's ass.

Octocamo
12-30-2004, 08:13 PM
Anyone's better than Chyna. Ugh, how gross was that? And it was the all-time best selling Playboy, to boot.
My Dad bought that one, Bahahah.

This better be some good stuff.

Arandar
12-30-2004, 09:27 PM
God I hope this is true. Although, I'm confused about the Torrie poses...she showed everything in the previous 2 issues she was in. Why only topless now?

They should dedicate an entire issue to Stacy Keibler's ass.
Thats where the red flag comes in signaling this guy might be full of it. I mean Torrie has done it twice before and showed everything so why would she only want to do topless now when others females from the WWE will be in it as well. Thats seems a bit suspicious if you ask me. Heh I just hope if its true that Trish appears fully nude in it. :D

KingKongSushi
01-02-2005, 02:51 AM
Thats where the red flag comes in signaling this guy might be full of it. I mean Torrie has done it twice before and showed everything so why would she only want to do topless now when others females from the WWE will be in it as well. Thats seems a bit suspicious if you ask me. Heh I just hope if its true that Trish appears fully nude in it. :D

Trish will never pose. She has stated it's against her morals. Well, they may each only get one page to the issue. That is, if this is true. I'm taking this with a grain of salt.

Arandar
01-02-2005, 02:36 PM
Trish will never pose. She has stated it's against her morals. Well, they may each only get one page to the issue. That is, if this is true. I'm taking this with a grain of salt.
What morals? Hasn't she been topless before? I swear I have seen her topless somewhere before with some other girl. Then in the WWE she has he tits sticking out as much as possible and has showed her ass before. You gotta love these woman who claim something is "against their morals" when asked to pose nude or topless, yet for work they are almost naked anyway. It reminds me of like when Beyonce Knowles was asked to pose nude when she was doing some photo shoot a few years ago and she said no because she was "a good Christian girl" or it was against her "morals" or some such BS like that. But apparently dressing and dancing like a whore is ok. And I will call her a liar to her face if she tries to claim she hasn't slept with Jay-Z at all.

Style
01-02-2005, 11:47 PM
What morals? Hasn't she been topless before? I swear I have seen her topless somewhere before with some other girl. Then in the WWE she has he tits sticking out as much as possible and has showed her ass before. You gotta love these woman who claim something is "against their morals" when asked to pose nude or topless, yet for work they are almost naked anyway. It reminds me of like when Beyonce Knowles was asked to pose nude when she was doing some photo shoot a few years ago and she said no because she was "a good Christian girl" or it was against her "morals" or some such BS like that. But apparently dressing and dancing like a whore is ok. And I will call her a liar to her face if she tries to claim she hasn't slept with Jay-Z at all.

I used to have a video of her in a white t shirt spraying water on herself, but that was a few years back, i think it was from before her wwf/e days.

Arandar
01-03-2005, 12:26 AM
I used to have a video of her in a white t shirt spraying water on herself, but that was a few years back, i think it was from before her wwf/e days.
I don't care if that was before her WWE days I have lost respect for now because of this. If she just doesn't want to post topless or naked then fine just say so. I can deal with, and respect, that. But when she tries to claim its "against her morals" when she HAS been topless before, and is supposed to act and dress slutty on a daily basis for work, then thats when I lose respect. I can deal with just not wanting to, I can't deal with claiming some moral crap when there is mountains of evidence to prove otherwise.

HMG
01-10-2005, 12:21 AM
I read about this in Sescoops.com for the first time. I was pretty excited, but this is only a rumor started on a message board. But, I do believe that this will happen. Christy Hemme has confirmed, though.

HMG
01-11-2005, 02:53 AM
I used to have a video of her in a white t shirt spraying water on herself, but that was a few years back, i think it was from before her wwf/e days.

Have it.
:smt023